Vibers · Human-in-the-loop Code Review

Human-in-the-loop code review for vibecoded projects.

We review and fix code written by AI vibecoders. Install our GitHub App, share your spec — we check every commit, catch hallucinations, fix security holes, and send a pull request with working code. You merge, keep shipping.

Install GitHub App — Free ⭐ Star on GitHub — first review free

30s setup · 0 clarifying questions · Pay-as-you-go $15/hr · Talk to us on Telegram

30s

Setup time

Free

first review (⭐ + feedback)

Clarifying questions

Using Claude Code, Cursor, or Windsurf? Tell your AI agent:

Install skill from https://onout.org/vibers/SKILL.md

Or write us on Telegram if you need help.

No GitHub? No problem

Not ready to connect GitHub yet? Just share your site URL — we'll test it manually and send you a report with what we find.

We'll look at your site, check the main flows, and reach out with findings. Free for the first review.

"Installed the app, got a PR with fixes the next day. Found a broken payment flow my Cursor agent had been shipping for weeks."

— MethasMP/Paycif, first client from Thailand

Summary What We Do

Honest disclaimer: We're not a security firm. No OWASP penetration tests, no architecture audits, no performance profiling. We're regular people who look at your code with fresh eyes — catch the obvious bugs, check that the main flows actually work, and write the fix instead of filing a ticket. Think alpha tester who also sends a PR.

Problem What AI Agents Miss

The reason AI is particularly terrible at this stage is because the devil is in the details — and the AI doesn't know what those details are, so it makes assumptions. Often incorrect.

AI Hallucinations & Gaps

Imports from libraries that don't exist
API calls with made-up endpoints or wrong signatures
Hardcoded secrets, missing auth, open CORS
Features that quietly drift from your spec
Small bugs that compound into a cleanup sprint

What we do

Catches hallucinations before production
We write the fixes, not just reports
Security holes patched, not just flagged
PRs with working code — merge and keep shipping
Runs in background on every push

Reviewers Who Reviews Your Code

@marsiandeployer

Senior engineers with 10+ years across JavaScript, Python, and distributed systems. Based in Europe. We've worked at startups from seed to Series B — we know what "good enough for now" looks like, and where it hurts later.

Real people, not another AI layer. When you get a PR from us, a human wrote every line.

Security What Access We Get (and Don't)

What the Vibers App can do

Read your code (clone, pull)
Create branches & open pull requests
Comment on commits

What we cannot do

Merge or push to main without your approval
Access other repos on your account
See private env files beyond what's committed

Revoke anytime: GitHub Settings → Applications → Installed GitHub Apps → Vibers Review → Uninstall. Takes 5 seconds. No lock-in.

NDA available on request for paid reviews.

Examples Before / After Fixes You Can Open

Each case stays collapsed until you open it, so the section scales cleanly as more fixes are added. Open any card to inspect the bug summary, before/after shots, prompt, and result.

Floor map before fix with overlapping desktop and mobile labels

Floor map after fix with readable mobile slot labels

Prompt used to get from before to after

Fix the mobile floor map labels. Right now both the desktop label and the short mobile label render for each slot, so the text overlaps and becomes unreadable on small screens. Show only one label variant per breakpoint, keep the short label on mobile, preserve slot alignment, and make sure every slot name stays readable without overlap.

Paycif before fix with pricing cards broken on mobile

Paycif after fix with pricing cards stacked on mobile

Prompt used to get from before to after

Fix the fee-card section on mobile. The pricing cards still render in columns at small widths and the section feels cramped. Add a mobile breakpoint that collapses the grid to one column, remove decorative transforms that break spacing on small screens, and keep the desktop layout unchanged.

Open PR #3

Chat UI before fix with a long message overflowing in one line

Chat UI after fix with long messages wrapping onto the next line

Prompt used to get from before to after

Fix long chat message wrapping in the conversation UI. Right now oversized messages stay on one line, overflow the container, and hurt readability. Update the message bubble styles so long text wraps onto the next line, preserves normal spacing, and stays fully readable on both desktop and mobile without changing the rest of the chat layout.

Poster selection UI before fix with the chosen poster not fully loading

Poster selection UI after fix with the chosen poster fully visible

Prompt used to get from before to after

Fix the selected poster preview in the responsive UI. Right now when a user picks a poster, the preview does not render the full chosen image on smaller screens, so the result looks incomplete. Update the preview container and image sizing logic so the selected poster loads fully, keeps its aspect ratio, and stays clearly visible without breaking the existing desktop layout.

Floor map before fix with edge slots rendered outside the background area

Floor map after fix with edge slots aligned inside the background area

Prompt used to get from before to after

Fix the responsive floor map layout on the page shown in the linked capture. Right now the outermost slots sit outside the light charcoal map background on mobile, so the composition looks broken and creates a visible UX/UI bug. Rework the mobile sizing and positioning so every slot stays inside the map surface, the edge spacing is consistent, and the floor map remains visually aligned without regressing the desktop layout.

Open issue capture

Before

After

Prompt used to get from before to after

Fix the Brand identity view in Stand settings for Screen 1/1. Right now the content inside the screen is flipped in the wrong direction, so the preview looks reversed and does not match the intended stand layout. Correct the orientation logic so the content renders in the proper direction, stays centered within the screen area, and preserves the existing layout on responsive breakpoints.

Open extra capture

Process How It Works

You push with your agent

→

We pull & review vs spec

→

Fix issues ourselves

→

Send PR with changes

→

You merge clean code

Install the App — One click on GitHub. Select which repos to give access to. Done.
Share Spec (optional) — Got a Google Doc or Notion page? Share it for better reviews. No spec? No problem — we read the code.
We Review & Fix — We check commits against your spec, find issues, write the actual code fixes.
Merge Clean Code — You get pull requests with working fixes. Review, merge, done.

Audience Who It's For

Claude Code users — Install our skill, your agent calls us on every push and gets a PR with anything it missed.
Cursor & Windsurf users — Add us to .cursorrules or AGENTS.md. Background reviewer that never disrupts your flow.
Solo builders — No team to review PRs? We are your second pair of eyes. Security holes and spec drift caught before users find them.
Small AI-first teams — Everyone vibes, nobody reviews. One setup, covers every dev's pushes.

Pricing Pricing — Pay As You Go

Early Adopter

Free / first review

Tell us how to test your product
Share specs or AI-generated test cases if you have them
We'll review manually and see what we can find
One PR with fixes if issues found
GitHub star + honest feedback in return

Limited spots. No big promises — just an honest look and one PR if we find something worth fixing.

Standard

$15 / hour

Full code review against your spec
PRs with fixes included
Security & architecture audit
Pay only for hours spent
Priority turnaround

A typical review of 5–10 commits takes 1–3 hours. No minimums, no contracts. We track time, send a report, you pay for actual work done.

Comparison How We Compare

Feature	SonarQube	CodeRabbit	PullRequest.com	This
Reads your spec / Google Doc	No	No	Partial	Yes
Sends PRs with actual fixes	No	No	No	Yes
Setup time	Hours	Minutes	Days	30 sec
Asks clarifying questions	N/A	N/A	Yes, many	No, just fixes
Price	Free-$375/mo	$12/user/mo	$500+/mo	Free*
Best for	CI pipeline	PR comments	Enterprise	Vibecoded MVPs

FAQ Frequently Asked Questions

What is a vibecoder?

Developers (often $1-5/hr from Upwork, Fiverr, or similar platforms) who use AI tools like Cursor, Copilot, or ChatGPT to write code quickly. Fast and cheap, but quality varies wildly.

Why not just use automated code review tools?

Tools like SonarQube catch syntax issues. We check if the code actually matches your business requirements. We read your Google Doc and verify that the feature does what you described — no AI tool does that reliably.

What's the Vibers GitHub App?

Our official GitHub App for accessing your repo, reviewing code, and submitting pull requests. Install it in one click — you choose exactly which repos to grant access to.

Do you actually fix code or just report bugs?

We fix it. Every review comes with a pull request containing our improvements. You review the PR and merge if you like it. No back-and-forth with bug tickets.

What tech stacks do you support?

JavaScript/TypeScript, Python, React, Node.js, Django, Flask, Next.js, and most popular web frameworks. If your stack is exotic, ask us first.

How is this different from hiring a senior dev?

A senior dev costs $50-150/hr. We offer a free first review (star our GitHub + leave feedback), then $15/hr standard. Pay-as-you-go. No contracts, no subscriptions. You keep your cheap vibecoders for velocity and add our review layer for quality.